A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php

Line Number: 126

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php

Line Number: 261

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php

Line Number: 143

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php

Line Number: 193

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php

Line Number: 278

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: 8192

Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice

Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php

Line Number: 306

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 281

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_set_cookie_params(): Session cookie parameters cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 293

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 303

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 313

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 314

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 315

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 316

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_set_save_handler(): Session save handler cannot be changed after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 107

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Session cannot be started after headers have already been sent

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 140

Backtrace:

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct

File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once

FIR was lodged on the same day within twenty-five (25) minutes of the incident which, minimized the chances of false implication - Lawyers of Pakistan

FIR was lodged on the same day within twenty-five (25) minutes of the incident which, minimized the chances of false implication

Citation Name : 2019 PCrLJN 34 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT
Side Appellant : TANVEER
Side Opponent : State
Absconsion--- Effect--- abscondence of accused was relevant factor but it could not be considered as conclusive proof of a crime---Prosecution had to independently prove the charge on the basis of strong and cogent evidence without any shadow of doubt that the accused had committed the crime.


Citation Name : 2018 SCMR 28 SUPREME-COURT
Side Appellant : Mst. RAVIDA
Side Opponent : AMJAD
S. 497(5)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Application for cancellation of bail---FIR was lodged on the same day within twenty-five (25) minutes of the incident which, minimized the chances of false implication---Both the accused persons had been specifically named in the FIR and assigned specific roles---Complainant, who was the mother of the deceased, claimed to be the eye-witness of the incident, and there hardly appeared any reason to disbelieve her---Medical report fully supported the version of the complainant---Accused persons remained absconders for almost 15 months after the incident, and no plausible reason was advanced to justify their abscondence ---Sufficient material was available on record which prima facie, connected the accused persons with the commission of offence---Bail granted to accused persons was recalled in circumstances.


Citation Name : 2018 YLR 2398 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Side Appellant : SAID WAHAB
Side Opponent : State
abscondence of accused---Effect---abscondence of accused could corroborate other convincing prosecution evidence---If ocular account and other circumstantial evidence on record was disbelieved, accused could not be convicted on the sole ground that he remained absconder.


Citation Name : 2018 YLR 2000 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Side Appellant : BHAI JAN
Side Opponent : ASFANDIYAR
S. 497(2)---Further inquiry---Bail was to be allowed to accused as a right in case of further enquiry, and such right could not be refused merely on account of abscondence of accused.


Citation Name : 2018 YLR 2000 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Side Appellant : BHAI JAN
Side Opponent : ASFANDIYAR
S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 496-B, 109 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention---Occurrence was unseen---Complainant, though had directly nominated accused and co-accused for commission of offence in his statement under S.164, Cr.P.C., but he had not disclosed the source on the basis of which he got satisfied about complicity of accused in the commission of offence---Co-accused (widow of the deceased), no doubt had recorded her confessional statement; wherein she while disclosing about her illicit relations with accused, had attributed the role of murder of the deceased to the accused on her instigation---High Court, while deciding appeal of co-accused against conviction, disbelieved her confessional statement and acquitted her---Confessional statement of co-accused was to be considered as a circumstance; but when confessional statement of co-accused had not been believed and there was no direct and circumstantial evidence against accused; whether the prosecution would be able to form opinion as to the guilt of accused, was a debatable question; which made his case arguable for bail---Accused had not confessed his guilt before the competent court of law; nor any incriminating articles to link him with the commission of offence had been recovered from his direct or indirect possession---Investigation against accused was complete and he was no more required for further interrogation---Right of bail, could not be refused to accused, merely on account of his abscondence , which was a factor relevant only to the propriety---Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances.


Citation Name : 2018 YLR 1798 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Side Appellant : MASAUD
Side Opponent : State
S.497---Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.17(4)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.458, 459, 460 & 109---Haraaba, house trespass and common intention---abscondence ---Bail, grant of---No one was mentioned in FIR as accused---Contradiction in statements of witnesses regarding participation of the petitioner in the commission of offence---Effect---abscondence ---Effect---Record revealed that the petitioner had not been charged in the FIR rather he had been nominated by co-accused in his statement under S.161, Cr.P.C. and by the complainant in his statement under S.164, Cr.P.C.---Complainant had , admittedly , shown four persons present in the courtyard of his house but while recording his statement under S.164, Cr.P.C., he charged six persons for the commission of offense, similarly, another co-accused had not disclosed the name of petitioner in his confessional statement regarding participation in the commission of offense---Mere abscondence was no ground to decline the bail if the accused was otherwise entitled for concession of bail---Accused had made out case for the grant of bail, in the circumstances.


Citation Name : 2018 YLR 1442 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Side Appellant : SHAUKAT
Side Opponent : JAMSHED
abscondence of accused---Scope---Mere abscondence of the accused could not be taken into consideration to record conviction.


Citation Name : 2018 YLR 1293 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Side Appellant : AFSAR KHAN
Side Opponent : State
abscondence --- Scope--- Mere abs-condence in absence of unimpeachable evidence was of no value.


Citation Name : 2018 YLR 933 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Side Appellant : ABDULLAH NASIR alias JUNEJO
Side Opponent : State
Absconsion of accused---Effect---Mere abscondence would not entail penal consequences against the accused.

Related Case Laws

Defence Saving Certificates Rules, 1966

Defence Saving Certificates Rules, 1966

Ali Hassnain Sargana

Ali Hassnain Sargana

Sohaib Sattar Sheikh

Sohaib Sattar Sheikh

Adv Nawaz Khosa

Adv Nawaz Khosa

2018 MLD 927 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

2018 MLD 927 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Dishonestly issuing a cheque

Dishonestly issuing a cheque

Accused had fundamental constitutional and legal right…

Accused had fundamental constitutional and legal right to have fair trial and to get opportunity to…

Accused was arrested during pendency of pre-arrest…

Accused was arrested during pendency of pre-arrest bail, in some other case and he was not present before…

Complainant/ injured succumbed to the injury

Complainant/ injured succumbed to the injury

Statement of witness recorded in ABSENCE OF ACCUSED

Statement of witness recorded in ABSENCE OF ACCUSED

ABSENCE OF ACCUSED

ABSENCE OF ACCUSED

Absconsion was only a corroborative piece of evidence;…

Absconsion was only a corroborative piece of evidence; same could be taken into consideration along…

Contact Us